www.hoop-math.com

College basketball play-by-play statistics

Cleveland State: 2011-2012

Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013

Player

FGA

TS%

%Shots at Rim

FG% at Rim

%Assisted at Rim

%Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

%Assisted 2pt Jumpers

%Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

%assisted 3pt

FTA/FGA

FT%

Jeremy Montgomery

236

0.538

28%

47%

13%

14%

39%

31%

58%

37%

61%

0.20

79%

Trevon Harmon

206

0.533

28%

47%

37%

16%

31%

60%

56%

39%

82%

0.17

82%

D'Aundray Brown

181

0.516

30%

67%

44%

48%

33%

28%

22%

38%

87%

0.22

79%

Anton Grady

165

0.542

48%

69%

56%

46%

34%

42%

5%

22%

100%

0.45

66%

Tim Kamczyc

154

0.654

48%

81%

80%

22%

35%

42%

30%

37%

100%

0.21

82%

Aaron Pogue

122

0.468

39%

58%

75%

60%

33%

50%

1%

100%

100%

0.48

57%

Charles Lee

90

0.445

23%

67%

14%

34%

23%

29%

42%

24%

44%

0.29

85%

Trey Harmon

42

0.492

38%

75%

58%

12%

0%

---

50%

19%

100%

0.24

100%

Marlin Mason

42

0.573

48%

55%

64%

26%

36%

0%

26%

55%

100%

0.21

56%

Ike Nwamu

34

0.574

24%

50%

50%

6%

0%

---

71%

46%

82%

0.32

36%

Sebastian Douglas

25

0.610

52%

69%

56%

32%

38%

0%

16%

50%

50%

0.24

67%

Charlie Lee

24

0.486

29%

71%

0%

38%

22%

0%

33%

25%

0%

0.33

88%

Ludovic Ndaye

20

0.429

25%

80%

75%

55%

27%

33%

20%

25%

100%

0.35

43%

Devon Long

14

0.681

57%

88%

43%

43%

33%

50%

0%

---

---

0.21

100%

Luda Ndaye

6

0.504

67%

75%

67%

33%

0%

---

0%

---

---

0.33

50%

TEAM

1361

0.535

35%

63%

53%

31%

32%

37%

34%

36%

76%

0.27

72%

Team Defensive Summary

Shot Type

% of shots

FG%

% of Shots Blocked

Unblocked FG%

At Rim

33%

63%

9%

69%

2pt Jumpers

36%

33%

8%

36%

3pt Shots

32%

29%

1%

29%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Offense

This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

11%

53%

54%

57%

20%

36%

26%

38%

Rebound, 11-35 s

20%

55%

29%

70%

34%

40%

37%

38%

Opp score, 0-10 s

6%

55%

34%

76%

23%

21%

44%

37%

Opp score, 11-35 s

36%

45%

28%

60%

35%

31%

37%

31%

Steal, 0-10 s

11%

69%

69%

73%

12%

36%

19%

52%

Steal, 11-35 s

4%

35%

27%

70%

43%

19%

30%

18%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

2%

28%

12%

33%

24%

50%

64%

12%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

10%

59%

22%

65%

41%

33%

37%

56%

Initial Shot Distribution Data -- Defense

This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against CLEVELAND STATE.

Start of poss

% of initial shots

eFG%

% Shots at rim

FG% at rim

% Shots 2pt Jumpers

FG% 2pt Jumpers

% Shots 3pt

FG% 3pt

Rebound, 0-10 s

14%

49%

43%

65%

24%

25%

34%

30%

Rebound, 11-35 s

20%

48%

24%

59%

47%

35%

28%

40%

Opp score, 0-10 s

5%

41%

21%

90%

32%

20%

47%

23%

Opp score, 11-35 s

38%

45%

27%

64%

36%

31%

37%

29%

Steal, 0-10 s

8%

63%

59%

67%

21%

36%

20%

54%

Steal, 11-35 s

4%

56%

24%

88%

44%

40%

32%

36%

Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s

2%

47%

28%

80%

39%

43%

33%

17%

Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s

10%

41%

27%

73%

29%

38%

44%

17%

Updated 2012-10-26